So freedom of speech and ideas is okay, but “crazy”, “radical” freedom of speech and ideas is not … unless it’s religious?
Copyright © henry toromoreno, 2009. All rights reserved.
-
Visitors
- 33,309 hits
-
People are saying ...
kerry on outside the manger Bryan Borland on Soldiers CT on The penalty for eating pomegra… Angel Arias on Young Leonel JC on The penalty for eating pomegra… CT on gossip CT on gossip heather grace stewar… on gossip ht on Sometimes it’s all … CT on Sometimes it’s all … -
Most Active
-
Posts
- Thank you and happy holy days
- Soldiers
- The flint breaks away
- Young Leonel
- Maid in Hollywood
- gossip
- Noah’s banana boat for alphabet animals
- Sometimes it’s all blue
- The penalty for eating pomegranate seeds
- In science news …
- Ending a conversation about opposites
- a meme
- DN_Angels
- Sermon for the godless
- Shaping the sands
Tags
Archives
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
Meta
Pages
well, of course, if he has religion to back up his ideas then he has a moral code. if he has no religious belief, then he’s an amoral sinner who’s ideas are based in anarchy.